linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add apss_shared and apps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190819173513.GK12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 23:05:14 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        sibis@...eaurora.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add apss_shared and
 apps_rsc nodes

On 14-08-19, 10:12, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-08-14 05:50:07)
> > Add apss_shared and apps_rsc node including the rpmhcc child node
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> 
> Can't this be squashed with the original dtsi file?

That makes it a huge blob, imo hard to review. I will still go ahead and
squash things in v2, but will still keep logical chunks.. (this can go
in original though)

> 
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> > index 5c6b103b042b..5258b79676f6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm8150.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
> 
> But not the rpmh clk bindings?

Thats missing will add

> 
> > @@ -272,6 +279,29 @@
> >                         };
> >                 };
> >  
> > +               apps_rsc: rsc@...00000 {
> > +                       label = "apps_rsc";
> > +                       compatible = "qcom,rpmh-rsc";
> > +                       reg = <0x18200000 0x10000>,
> > +                             <0x18210000 0x10000>,
> > +                             <0x18220000 0x10000>;
> > +                       reg-names = "drv-0", "drv-1", "drv-2";
> > +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                                    <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                                    <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +                       qcom,tcs-offset = <0xd00>;
> > +                       qcom,drv-id = <2>;
> > +                       qcom,tcs-config = <ACTIVE_TCS  2>,
> > +                                         <SLEEP_TCS   1>,
> > +                                         <WAKE_TCS    1>,
> > +                                         <CONTROL_TCS 0>;
> > +
> > +                       rpmhcc: clock-controller {
> > +                               compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk";
> > +                               #clock-cells = <1>;
> 
> Should take some sort of clocks property to get the board clock for XO?

Yes after conversion, I have updated this now

-- 
~Vinod