[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190820171640.elgrbetjivvk7zti@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:16:40 +0200
From: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 0/7] fs: Substitute bit-spinlocks for PREEMPT_RT and
debugging
On 2019-08-10 01:18:34 [-0700], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Does SLUB work on -rt at all?
> >
> > It's the only allocator we support with a few tweaks :)
>
> What do you do about this particular piece of code there?
This part remains untouched. This "lock" is acquired within ->list_lock
which is a raw_spinlock_t and disables preemption/interrupts on -RT.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists