[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190820203939.GV2349@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:39:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix: trace sched switch start/stop racy updates
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 01:31:35PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 04:01:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > We really should get the compiler folks to give us a
> > -fno-pointer-provenance. Waiting on the standards committee to get their
> > act together seems unlikely, esp. given that some people actually seem
> > to _want_ this nonsense :/
>
> The reason that they want it is to enable some significant optimizations
> in numerical code on the one hand and in heavily templated C++ code on
> the other. Neither of which has much bearing on kernel code.
>
> Interested in coming to the next C standards committee meeting in October
> to help me push for this? ;-)
How about we try and get some compiler folks together at plumbers and
bribe them with beer? Once we have our compiler knob, we happy :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists