[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <228dfbae-1e73-2a9c-f6f0-799a07cd31bc@st.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:09:58 +0000
From: Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@...com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>,
Mickael GUENE <mickael.guene@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] DCMI bridge support
Hi Sakari, Hans,
st-mipid02 changes are already merged, thanks Sakari and sorry for
disturbance.
Still remain the V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ for OV5640.
On 8/19/19 11:13 AM, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
> Hi Hans, Sakari,
>
> OK to push separately the 80 char fix.
>
> There was pending related changes on st-mipid02 and ov5640 (listed
> below), do you think it's possible to take them also ?
>
>
> media: st-mipid02: add support of V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/56969/
> State Accepted
>
> [v2,1/3] media: st-mipid02: add support of RGB565
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/56970/
> State Accepted
>
> [v2,2/3] media: st-mipid02: add support of YUYV8 and UYVY8
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/56971/
> State Accepted
>
> [v2,3/3] media: st-mipid02: add support of JPEG
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/56973/
> State Accepted
>
>
> [v2] media: ov5640: add support of V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/57215/
> State Changes Requested
> => This change is needed to make it work the whole setup.
> => I don't know what to change here, even if this 384MHz fixed value
> seems strange, it works fine on my setup, on my opinion it's better than
> nothing. We could come back on this later on when other OV5640 CSI
> interfaces will require V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ value.
>
> Sakari, what do you think about this ?
>
>
> BR,
> Hugues.
BR,
Hugues.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists