[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190820081820.GI3111@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:18:20 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@...il.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jglisse@...hat.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
william.kucharski@...cle.com, hch@....de,
inux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v6 1/2] sgi-gru: Convert put_page()
to put_user_page*()
On Mon 19-08-19 12:30:18, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 8/19/19 12:06 PM, Bharath Vedartham wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 07:56:11AM -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> > > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > John, would you like to take this patch into your miscellaneous
> > conversions patch set?
> >
>
> (+Andrew and Michal, so they know where all this is going.)
>
> Sure, although that conversion series [1] is on a brief hold, because
> there are additional conversions desired, and the API is still under
> discussion. Also, reading between the lines of Michal's response [2]
> about it, I think people would prefer that the next revision include
> the following, for each conversion site:
>
> Conversion of gup/put_page sites:
>
> Before:
>
> get_user_pages(...);
> ...
> for each page:
> put_page();
>
> After:
>
> gup_flags |= FOLL_PIN; (maybe FOLL_LONGTERM in some cases)
> vaddr_pin_user_pages(...gup_flags...)
I was hoping that FOLL_PIN would be handled by vaddr_pin_user_pages.
> ...
> vaddr_unpin_user_pages(); /* which invokes put_user_page() */
>
> Fortunately, it's not harmful for the simpler conversion from put_page()
> to put_user_page() to happen first, and in fact those have usually led
> to simplifications, paving the way to make it easier to call
> vaddr_unpin_user_pages(), once it's ready. (And showing exactly what
> to convert, too.)
If that makes the later conversion easier then no real objections from
me. Assuming that the current put_user_page conversions are correct of
course (I have the mlock one and potentials that falls into the same
category in mind).
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists