[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908201509020.2223@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:09:52 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/44] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup and consolidation
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 04:31:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The series applies on top of:
> > 
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git timers/core
> > 
> > and is available from git as well:
> > 
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git WIP.timers/core
> 
> It seems like this basically reverts the last patch in timers/core
> again.  Do you really want to keep that or start with a better baseline?
If the callback variant is agreed on, I'm going to zap that patch which it
replaces.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
