[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9980292a-a073-201c-ae06-c8cdbc9f98af@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:11:28 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
swkhack <swkhack@...il.com>,
"Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] mm/lru: move pgdat lru_lock into lruvec
在 2019/8/20 下午9:40, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 05:48:24PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -295,6 +295,9 @@ struct zone_reclaim_stat {
>>
>> struct lruvec {
>> struct list_head lists[NR_LRU_LISTS];
>> + /* move lru_lock to per lruvec for memcg */
>> + spinlock_t lru_lock;
>
> This comment makes no sense outside the context of this patch.
>
Right, Thanks for point out this. will remove it in v2.
Thanks
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists