[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <463379e3-5a31-5064-dd02-ea2fe149fa7e@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:18:06 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/pti: in pti_clone_pgtable() don't increase addr by
PUD_SIZE
On 8/20/19 7:14 AM, Song Liu wrote:
>> *But*, that shouldn't get hit on a Skylake CPU since those have PCIDs
>> and shouldn't have a global kernel image. Could you confirm whether
>> PCIDs are supported on this CPU?
> Yes, pcid is listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
So what's going on? Could you confirm exactly which pti_clone_pgtable()
is causing you problems? Do you have a theory as to why this manifests
as a performance problem rather than a functional one?
A diff of these:
/sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/current_user
/sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/current_kernel
before and after your patch might be helpful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists