linux-kernel - Re: kernel panic in 5.3-rc5, nfsd_reply_cache_stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74aeafff-a123-bf20-4b5e-9cd636bdb22e@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:11:22 -0700
From:   jane.chu@...cle.com
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     CHUCK_LEVER <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel panic in 5.3-rc5, nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show+0x11

Hi, Dan,

On 8/20/19 8:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:39 PM <jane.chu@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apology if there is a better channel reporting the issue, if so, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> I just saw below regression in 5.3-rc5 kernel, but not in 5.2-rc7 or
>> earlier kernels.
> 
> Is the error stable enough to bisect?
> 

The error is stable, I haven't tried bisect, thought to report the issue
first since it's late in the 5.3 process.
Then saw Bruce' email, I'll report soon whether the patch takes care the 
issue.

thanks!
-jane