linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/RFT v4 0/5] Add generic trusted keys framework/subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190821191242.7z3en7om2few4tao@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:12:42 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
        peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT v4 0/5] Add generic trusted keys framework/subsystem

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:16:46AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> I agree here that 5/5 should go along with TEE patch-set. But if you
> look at initial v1 patch-set, the idea was to get feedback on trusted
> keys abstraction as a standalone patch along with testing using a TPM
> (1.x or 2.0).
> 
> Since Mimi has tested this patch-set with TPM (1.x & 2.0), I am happy
> to merge 5/5 with TEE patch-set. But it would be nice if I could get
> feedback on 5/5 before I send next version of TEE patch-set.

OK, that is understandable. I'll check it out tomorrow.

/Jarkko