linux-kernel - [patch V2 25/38] posix-cpu-timers: Provide array based sample functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190821192921.590362974@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:09:12 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [patch V2 25/38] posix-cpu-timers: Provide array based sample
 functions

Instead of using task_cputime and doing the addition of utime and stime at
all call sites, it's way simpler to have a sample array which allows
indexed based checks against the expiry cache array.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -202,6 +202,32 @@ static u64 cpu_clock_sample(const clocki
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline void store_samples(u64 *samples, u64 stime, u64 utime, u64 rtime)
+{
+	samples[CPUCLOCK_PROF] = stime + utime;
+	samples[CPUCLOCK_VIRT] = utime;
+	samples[CPUCLOCK_SCHED] = rtime;
+}
+
+static void task_sample_cputime(struct task_struct *p, u64 *samples)
+{
+	u64 stime, utime;
+
+	task_cputime(p, &utime, &stime);
+	store_samples(samples, stime, utime, p->se.sum_exec_runtime);
+}
+
+static void proc_sample_cputime_atomic(struct task_cputime_atomic *at,
+				       u64 *samples)
+{
+	u64 stime, utime, rtime;
+
+	utime = atomic64_read(&at->utime);
+	stime = atomic64_read(&at->stime);
+	rtime = atomic64_read(&at->sum_exec_runtime);
+	store_samples(samples, stime, utime, rtime);
+}
+
 /*
  * Set cputime to sum_cputime if sum_cputime > cputime. Use cmpxchg
  * to avoid race conditions with concurrent updates to cputime.