[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190821200521.17283-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:05:12 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/11] soundwire: remove DAI_ID_RANGE definitions
There is no reason to reserve a range of DAI IDs for SoundWire. This
is not scalable and it's better to let the ASoC core allocate the
dai->id when registering a component.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 2 --
include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
index c95222f18c75..d5563cfc6549 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
@@ -952,8 +952,6 @@ static int intel_create_dai(struct sdw_cdns *cdns,
dais[i].capture.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;
}
- dais[i].id = SDW_DAI_ID_RANGE_START + i;
-
if (pcm)
dais[i].ops = &intel_pcm_dai_ops;
else
diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
index be9fe08d4e9c..db974003fe13 100644
--- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
+++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
@@ -40,9 +40,6 @@ struct sdw_slave;
#define SDW_VALID_PORT_RANGE(n) ((n) <= 14 && (n) >= 1)
-#define SDW_DAI_ID_RANGE_START 100
-#define SDW_DAI_ID_RANGE_END 200
-
enum {
SDW_PORT_DIRN_SINK = 0,
SDW_PORT_DIRN_SOURCE,
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists