linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/14] arm64: dts: meson-g12a-x96-max: fix compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:14:28 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     khilman@...libre.com, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] arm64: dts: meson-g12a-x96-max: fix compatible

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:08 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> On 20/08/2019 22:32, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:33 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This fixes the following DT schemas check errors:
> >> meson-g12a-x96-max.dt.yaml: /: compatible: ['amediatech,x96-max', 'amlogic,u200', 'amlogic,g12a'] is not valid under any of the given schemas
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
> >
> > [...]
> >> -       compatible = "amediatech,x96-max", "amlogic,u200", "amlogic,g12a";
> >> +       compatible = "amediatech,x96-max", "amlogic,g12a";
> > only partially related: I wonder if we should add a s905x2 compatible
> > string here and to the .dts filename (just like we separate the GXL
> > variants s905x, s905d, s905w, ...)
> >
>
> We could, but AFAIK no variants of G12A are planned yet...
we already support two variants: S905X2 and S905D2 (I'm assuming that
these are similar to S905X and S905D meaning both are almost
identical)
but I guess we can stay with what we have until there's a reason to
have separate compatible strings (for example if we discover that
there is a difference that matters - like the OPP table on S922X vs
A311D)