linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] tpm: tpm_tis_spi: Add a pre-transfer callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d5dbb3f.1c69fb81.eaa49.52b0@mx.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:44:31 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>,
        Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] tpm: tpm_tis_spi: Add a pre-transfer callback

Quoting Jarkko Sakkinen (2019-08-21 12:11:31)
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:07:41AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Any name is fine for me. Any suggestions?
> 
> What if just add @ready to struct tpm_tis_spi_phy add drop this patch
> altogether?
> 
> It is only used only by CR50 but I think it is less of an overkill than
> adding a callback.
> 

Ok, sounds good.