linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/cpu: Add new Intel Atom CPU model name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a0ce209-697f-a20c-6be8-f3b7f683c978@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:21:43 +0800
From:   "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        "alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com" 
        <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Wu, Qiming" <qi-ming.wu@...el.com>,
        "Kim, Cheol Yong" <cheol.yong.kim@...el.com>,
        "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/cpu: Add new Intel Atom CPU model name


On 20/8/2019 10:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:48:05PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>>> +#define INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT_NP    0x75 /* Lightning Mountain */
>>> What's _NP ?
>> Network Processor. But that is too narrow a descriptor. This is going to be used in
>> other areas besides networking.
>>
>> I’m contemplating calling it AIRMONT2
> What would describe the special sause that warranted a new SOC? If this
> thing is marketed as 'Network Processor' then I suppose we can actually
> use it, esp. if we're going to see this more, like the MID thing -- that
> lived for a while over multiple uarchs.
>
> Note that for the big cores we added the NNPI thing, which was for
> Neural Network Processing something.


INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT_NP was used keeping in mind the recommended

symbol naming form i.e. INTEL_FAM6{OPTFAMILY}_{MICROARCH}{OPTDIFF}

where OPTDIFF is supposed to be the market segment.


This SoC uses AMT (Admantium/Airmont) configuration which is supposed to be

a higher configuration. Looking at other existing examples, it seems that

INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT_PLUS is most appropriate. Would you have any

concerns with _PLUS name ? Thanks.