[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190821032406.GA28625@archbox>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:24:06 -0700
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
To: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mdf@...nel.org,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
atull@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] fpga: dfl: make init callback optional
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:49:56AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> This patch makes init callback of sub features optional. With
> this change, people don't need to prepare any empty init callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> index c0512af..96a2b82 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> @@ -271,11 +271,13 @@ static int dfl_feature_instance_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct dfl_feature *feature,
> struct dfl_feature_driver *drv)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> - ret = drv->ops->init(pdev, feature);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (drv->ops->init) {
> + ret = drv->ops->init(pdev, feature);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> feature->ops = drv->ops;
You could swap it around maybe like so:
int dfl_feature_instance_init() ...
{
feature->ops = drv->ops;
if (drv->ops->init)
return drv->ops->init(pdev, feature);
return 0;
}
With the caveat that feature->ops gets always set ...
Your call.
Thanks,
Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists