linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] OPP: Add support for bandwidth OPP tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190821052417.gby4borlnxv2xacr@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:54:17 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "Sweeney, Sean" <seansw@....qualcomm.com>,
        David Dai <daidavid1@...eaurora.org>, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] OPP: Add support for bandwidth OPP tables

On 20-08-19, 15:36, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:27 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:13 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 07-08-19, 15:31, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> 
> > > > +     ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "opp-peak-kBps", &bw);
> > > > +     if (ret)
> > > > +             return ret;
> > > > +     new_opp->rate = (unsigned long) bw;
> > > > +
> > > > +     ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "opp-avg-kBps", &bw);
> > > > +     if (!ret)
> > > > +             new_opp->avg_bw = (unsigned long) bw;
> > >
> > > If none of opp-hz/level/peak-kBps are available, print error message here
> > > itself..
> >
> > But you don't print any error for opp-level today. Seems like it's optional?
> >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +     return 0;
> > >
> > > You are returning 0 on failure as well here.
> >
> > Thanks.
> 
> Wait, no. This is not actually a failure. opp-avg-kBps is optional. So
> returning 0 is the right thing to do. If the mandatory properties
> aren't present an error is returned before you get to th end.

You are right :)

-- 
viresh