[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190821064732.GW3111@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:47:32 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Edward Chron <echron@...sta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, colona@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/oom: Add oom_score_adj value to oom Killed process
message
On Tue 20-08-19 20:25:32, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, Edward Chron wrote:
>
> > For an OOM event: print oom_score_adj value for the OOM Killed process to
> > document what the oom score adjust value was at the time the process was
> > OOM Killed. The adjustment value can be set by user code and it affects
> > the resulting oom_score so it is used to influence kill process selection.
> >
> > When eligible tasks are not printed (sysctl oom_dump_tasks = 0) printing
> > this value is the only documentation of the value for the process being
> > killed. Having this value on the Killed process message documents if a
> > miscconfiguration occurred or it can confirm that the oom_score_adj
> > value applies as expected.
> >
> > An example which illustates both misconfiguration and validation that
> > the oom_score_adj was applied as expected is:
> >
> > Aug 14 23:00:02 testserver kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 2692
> > (systemd-udevd) total-vm:1056800kB, anon-rss:1052760kB, file-rss:4kB,
> > shmem-rss:0kB oom_score_adj:1000
> >
> > The systemd-udevd is a critical system application that should have an
> > oom_score_adj of -1000. Here it was misconfigured to have a adjustment
> > of 1000 making it a highly favored OOM kill target process. The output
> > documents both the misconfiguration and the fact that the process
> > was correctly targeted by OOM due to the miconfiguration. Having
> > the oom_score_adj on the Killed message ensures that it is documented.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edward Chron <echron@...sta.com>
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>
> vm.oom_dump_tasks is pretty useful, however, so it's curious why you
> haven't left it enabled :/
Because it generates a lot of output potentially. Think of a workload
with too many tasks which is not uncommon.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists