[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190821070026.q24xtcagwwlraany@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:00:26 +0200
From: "bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: "Li, Philip" <philip.li@...el.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, lkp <lkp@...el.com>,
"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"williams@...hat.com" <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with
local_lock
On 2019-08-21 08:44:22 [+0200], Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi Juri, currently if the mail subject has RFC, we will test it but send report
> > privately to author only.
>
> OK. But, my email had "RT" and not "RFC" in the subject (since it is
> meant for one of the PREEMPT_RT stable trees [1]).
Was the RT tag consider at all at some point? I remember I asked for it
and then the bot did not complain again or I don't remember. At the same
point my rt-devel tree was added to the trees-to-be-tested.
> Best,
>
> Juri
>
> 1 - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git v4.19-rt
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists