linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efi/arm: fix allocation failure when reserving the kernel base

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu99z3V1B68CU8qhNwwffqDxNBOM6t3Q8-V7qpbDkf-Cwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:29:37 +0300
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>, Juergen Gross <JGross@...e.com>,
        Joey Lee <JLee@...e.com>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "guillaume.gardet@....com" <guillaume.gardet@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "ren_guo@...ky.com" <ren_guo@...ky.com>, Gary Lin <GLin@...e.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi/arm: fix allocation failure when reserving the kernel base

On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 10:11, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 09:35:16AM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 09:11, Chester Lin <clin@...e.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:28:25PM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 14:56, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > > > <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 05:38:54AM +0000, Chester Lin wrote:
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> > > > > > index f3ce34113f89..909b11ba48d8 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> > > > > > @@ -1184,6 +1184,9 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
> > > > > >               phys_addr_t block_start = reg->base;
> > > > > >               phys_addr_t block_end = reg->base + reg->size;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +             if (memblock_is_nomap(reg))
> > > > > > +                     continue;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >               if (reg->base < vmalloc_limit) {
> > > > > >                       if (block_end > lowmem_limit)
> > > > > >                               /*
> > > > >
> > > > > I think this hunk is sane - if the memory is marked nomap, then it isn't
> > > > > available for the kernel's use, so as far as calculating where the
> > > > > lowmem/highmem boundary is, it effectively doesn't exist and should be
> > > > > skipped.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree.
> > > >
> > > > Chester, could you explain what you need beyond this change (and my
> > > > EFI stub change involving TEXT_OFFSET) to make things work on the
> > > > RPi2?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Ard,
> > >
> > > In fact I am working with Guillaume to try booting zImage kernel and openSUSE
> > > from grub2.04 + arm32-efistub so that's why we get this issue on RPi2, which is
> > > one of the test machines we have. However we want a better solution for all
> > > cases but not just RPi2 since we don't want to affect other platforms as well.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Chester, but that doesn't answer my question.
> >
> > Your fix is a single patch that changes various things that are only
> > vaguely related. We have already identified that we need to take
> > TEXT_OFFSET (minus some space used by the swapper page tables) into
> > account into the EFI stub if we want to ensure compatibility with many
> > different platforms, and as it turns out, this applies not only to
> > RPi2 but to other platforms as well, most notably the ones that
> > require a TEXT_OFFSET of 0x208000, since they also have reserved
> > regions at the base of RAM.
> >
> > My question was what else we need beyond:
> > - the EFI stub TEXT_OFFSET fix [0]
> > - the change to disregard NOMAP memblocks in adjust_lowmem_bounds()
> > - what else???
>
> I think the only missing part here is to ensure that non-reserved memory in
> bank 0 starts from a PMD-aligned address. I believe this could be done if
> EFI stub, but I'm not really familiar with it so this just a semi-educated
> guess :)
>

Given that it is the ARM arch code that imposes this requirement, how
about adding something like this to adjust_lowmem_bounds():

if (memblock_start_of_DRAM() % PMD_SIZE)
    memblock_mark_nomap(memblock_start_of_DRAM(),
        PMD_SIZE - (memblock_start_of_DRAM() % PMD_SIZE));

(and introduce the nomap check into the loop)