[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190821103456.GY2349@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:34:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "longli@...uxonhyperv.com" <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: define a function to report the number of
context switches on a CPU
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 08:20:48AM +0000, Long Li wrote:
> >>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: define a function to report the number of
> >>>context switches on a CPU
> >>>
> >>>On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:14:27PM -0700, longli@...uxonhyperv.com
> >>>wrote:
> >>>> From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> The number of context switches on a CPU is useful to determine how
> >>>> busy this CPU is on processing IRQs. Export this information so it can
> >>>> be used by device drivers.
> >>>
> >>>Please do explain that; because I'm not seeing how number of switches
> >>>relates to processing IRQs _at_all_!
>
> Some kernel components rely on context switch to progress, for example
> watchdog and RCU. On a CPU with reasonable interrupt load, it
> continues to make context switches, normally a number of switches per
> seconds.
That isn't true; RCU is perfectly fine with a single task always running
and not making context switches, and so is the watchdog.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists