linux-kernel - Re: [v2] rtc: pcf85363/pcf85263: fix error that failed to run hwclock -w

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:47:22 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, nandor.han@...sala.com,
        Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2] rtc: pcf85363/pcf85263: fix error that failed to run
 hwclock -w

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:38:56PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 21/08/2019 12:30:29+0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > What's the mechanism here?  It's a very strange thing to require.

> The clock control is on the first register, then you have sec, min,
> hour, day, mon, year.

> To be able to set the clock accurately, you need to first disable the
> clock, then set the time and date and finally reenable the clock in the
> first register. This should be done in a single i2c write.

Ugh, right.  And of course it would be silly to put the enable register
last or done some sort of strobe thing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)