[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558e1227-7671-0838-d4e0-f234833c0973@mentor.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:26:31 +0900
From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: <nick@...anahar.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <george_davis@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/63] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - only read messages in
mxt_acquire_irq() when necessary
Hi Dmitry
On 2019/08/17 2:16, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 05:28:52PM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote:
>> From: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>
>>
>> The workaround of reading all messages until an invalid is received is a
>> way of forcing the CHG line high, which means that when using
>> edge-triggered interrupts the interrupt can be acquired.
>>
>> With level-triggered interrupts the workaround is unnecessary.
>>
>> Also, most recent maXTouch chips have a feature called RETRIGEN which, when
>> enabled, reasserts the interrupt line every cycle if there are messages
>> waiting. This also makes the workaround unnecessary.
>>
>> Note: the RETRIGEN feature is only in some firmware versions/chips, it's
>> not valid simply to enable the bit.
>
> Instead of trying to work around of misconfiguration for IRQ/firmware,
> can we simply error out of probe if we see a level interrupt with
> !RETRIGEN firmware?
>
I think for old firmwares, which doesn't support RETRIGEN feature, this
workaround is needed, otherwise we will break all old firmwares, which
configured with edge-triggered IRQ
for recent firmwares which support RETRIGEN feature, we can fail probe,
if RETRIGEN is not enabled, and configured with edge-triggered IRQ.
what is your thought?
Thanks,
Jiada
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists