linux-kernel - RE: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E66249520CA35E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 01:43:55 +0000
From:   "Li, Philip" <philip.li@...el.com>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, lkp <lkp@...el.com>
CC:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        "kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "williams@...hat.com" <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with
 local_lock

> Subject: Re: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with
> local_lock
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 20/08/19 13:35, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Juri,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> > [cannot apply to v5.3-rc5 next-20190819]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system]
> 
> This seems to be indeed the case, as this patch is for RT v4.19-rt
> stable tree:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git v4.19-rt
> 
> I was under the impression that putting "RT" on the subject line (before
> PATCH) would prevent build bot to pick this up, but maybe something
> else/different is needed?
Hi Juri, currently if the mail subject has RFC, we will test it but send report
privately to author only.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Juri