[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190821143655.GA13637@linux-8ccs>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:36:55 +0200
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
arnd@...db.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org, hpa@...or.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
lucas.de.marchi@...il.com, maco@...roid.com, maco@...gle.com,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, mingo@...hat.com, oneukum@...e.com,
pombredanne@...b.com, sam@...nborg.org, sspatil@...gle.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, tglx@...utronix.de,
usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net, x86@...nel.org,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] RFC: usb-storage: export symbols in USB_STORAGE
namespace
+++ Greg KH [21/08/19 05:38 -0700]:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:49:25PM +0100, Matthias Maennich wrote:
>> Modules using these symbols are required to explicitly import the
>> namespace. This patch was generated with the following steps and serves
>> as a reference to use the symbol namespace feature:
>>
>> 1) Define DEFAULT_SYMBOL_NAMESPACE in the corresponding Makefile
>> 2) make (see warnings during modpost about missing imports)
>> 3) make nsdeps
>>
>> Instead of a DEFAULT_SYMBOL_NAMESPACE definition, the EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS
>> variants can be used to explicitly specify the namespace. The advantage
>> of the method used here is that newly added symbols are automatically
>> exported and existing ones are exported without touching their
>> respective EXPORT_SYMBOL macro expansion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>
>
>This looks good to me. This can be included with the rest of this
>series when/if it goes through the kbuild or module tree:
>
>Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
>Actually, which tree will this be going through?
I would be happy to take the patchset through the modules tree once it
collects the appropriate ack/reviewed-by's and once I get a chance to
sit down and review/test it next week :)
Thanks!
Jessica
Powered by blists - more mailing lists