[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190821161934.GE27031@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:19:34 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.2.9-rt3
On 21/08/2019 17:15:30+0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-08-21 16:58:37 [+0200], Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 21/08/2019 16:42:30+0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2019-08-21 16:21:10 [+0200], Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure it is worth it as the issue is introduced by
> > > > clocksource-tclib-allow-higher-clockrates.patch. Shouldn't we fix it
> > > > directly?
> > >
> > > you want to get rid of CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC_USE_SLOW_CLOCK and use
> > > the highest possible frequency by default?
> > >
> >
> > No, I meant the issue fixed by clocksource-tclib-add-proper-depend.patch
> > is introduced by clocksource-tclib-allow-higher-clockrates.patch so I
> > would think fixing clocksource-tclib-allow-higher-clockrates.patch is
> > preferable than having a separate patch.
> >
> > But maybe you meant you wanted a patch to fix
> > clocksource-tclib-allow-higher-clockrates.patch
>
> got it. So clocksource-tclib-allow-higher-clockrates.patch becomes:
>
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> @@ -424,11 +424,18 @@ config ATMEL_ST
>
> config ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC
> bool "Atmel TC Block timer driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> - depends on HAS_IOMEM
> + depends on HAS_IOMEM && ATMEL_TCLIB
Nope, this dependency is not necessary, please find the patch attached.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
View attachment "0001-clocksource-TCLIB-Allow-higher-clock-rates-for-clock.patch" of type "text/plain" (6082 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists