[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5BBC6CB3-2DCD-4A95-90C9-7C23482F9B32@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:23:22 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/balloon_compaction: suppress allocation warnings
> On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:05 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 20.08.19 11:16, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> There is no reason to print warnings when balloon page allocation fails,
>> as they are expected and can be handled gracefully. Since VMware
>> balloon now uses balloon-compaction infrastructure, and suppressed these
>> warnings before, it is also beneficial to suppress these warnings to
>> keep the same behavior that the balloon had before.
>
> I am not sure if that's a good idea. The allocation warnings are usually
> the only trace of "the user/admin did something bad because he/she tried
> to inflate the balloon to an unsafe value". Believe me, I processed a
> couple of such bugreports related to virtio-balloon and the warning were
> very helpful for that.
Ok, so a message is needed, but does it have to be a generic frightening
warning?
How about using __GFP_NOWARN, and if allocation do something like:
pr_warn(“Balloon memory allocation failed”);
Or even something more informative? This would surely be less intimidating
for common users.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists