lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc023b76c2d7685c067660d298613379c95b27e3.camel@wdc.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:36:41 +0000
From:   Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>
To:     "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "schwab@...ux-m68k.org" <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        "aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        "allison@...utok.net" <allison@...utok.net>,
        "anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
        "palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize tlb flush path.

On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 07:45 -0700, hch@...radead.org wrote:
> Btw, for the next version it also might make sense to do one
> optimization at a time.  E.g. the empty cpumask one as the
> first patch, the local cpu directly one next, and the threshold
> based full flush as a third.

ok sure. I will refactor my optimization patch and remove the base
patch(moving the functions from header to tlbflush.c) as you have
already sent it out.

-- 
Regards,
Atish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ