[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190822170811.13303-87-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:07:22 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 086/135] Revert "kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection"
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit df9576def004d2cd5beedc00cb6e8901427634b9 ]
When running ltp's oom test with kmemleak enabled, the below warning was
triggerred since kernel detects __GFP_NOFAIL & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is
passed in:
WARNING: CPU: 105 PID: 2138 at mm/page_alloc.c:4608 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1c31/0x1d50
Modules linked in: loop dax_pmem dax_pmem_core ip_tables x_tables xfs virtio_net net_failover virtio_blk failover ata_generic virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio libata
CPU: 105 PID: 2138 Comm: oom01 Not tainted 5.2.0-next-20190710+ #7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1c31/0x1d50
...
kmemleak_alloc+0x4e/0xb0
kmem_cache_alloc+0x2a7/0x3e0
mempool_alloc_slab+0x2d/0x40
mempool_alloc+0x118/0x2b0
bio_alloc_bioset+0x19d/0x350
get_swap_bio+0x80/0x230
__swap_writepage+0x5ff/0xb20
The mempool_alloc_slab() clears __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, however kmemleak
has __GFP_NOFAIL set all the time due to d9570ee3bd1d4f2 ("kmemleak:
allow to coexist with fault injection"). But, it doesn't make any sense
to have __GFP_NOFAIL and ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM specified at the same
time.
According to the discussion on the mailing list, the commit should be
reverted for short term solution. Catalin Marinas would follow up with
a better solution for longer term.
The failure rate of kmemleak metadata allocation may increase in some
circumstances, but this should be expected side effect.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1563299431-111710-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: d9570ee3bd1d4f2 ("kmemleak: allow to coexist with fault injection")
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 3e147ea831826..3afb01bce736a 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
/* GFP bitmask for kmemleak internal allocations */
#define gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp) (((gfp) & (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC)) | \
__GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | \
- __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NOFAIL)
+ __GFP_NOWARN)
/* scanning area inside a memory block */
struct kmemleak_scan_area {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists