[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190822171733.115889899@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:19:26 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 098/103] sctp: fix the transport error_count check
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit a1794de8b92ea6bc2037f445b296814ac826693e ]
As the annotation says in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike():
"If the transport error count is greater than the pf_retrans
threshold, and less than pathmaxrtx ..."
It should be transport->error_count checked with pathmaxrxt,
instead of asoc->pf_retrans.
Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
*/
if (net->sctp.pf_enable &&
(transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
- (asoc->pf_retrans < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
+ (transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
(transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists