[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB28638ABB58605D7D2ADBA852DFA50@VI1PR0402MB2863.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:41:07 +0000
From: Stefan-gabriel Mirea <stefan-gabriel.mirea@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Cosmin Stefan Stoica <cosmin.stoica@....com>,
Larisa Ileana Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: serial: Document Freescale LINFlex
UART
Hello Rob,
Thank you for the review.
On 8/22/2019 12:18 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:29:14AM +0000, Stefan-gabriel Mirea wrote:
>> +* Freescale Linflex UART
>
> Be consistent with the name: LINFlexD?
This was also brought up in our internal review. However, the reference
manual is also inconsistent, using LINFlexD, LINflexD, LinFlexD,
LINFlex, LINFLEX, LinFlex and Linflex. I will switch to 'LINFlexD'
everywhere, though.
>> +The LINFlexD controller implements several LIN protocol versions, as well as
>> +support for full-duplex UART communication through 8-bit and 9-bit frames. The
>> +Linflex UART driver enables operation only in UART mode.
>
> What the driver supports or not is independent of the binding.
Ok, I will remove the last sentence ("The Linflex UART driver enables
operation only in UART mode").
>> + - "fsl,s32-linflexuart" for linflex configured in uart mode which
>
> LINFlexD?
Will fix; I agree that the all lowercase version has no occurrence in
the reference manual.
>> + is compatible with the one integrated on S32V234 SoC
>
> Compatibles should be SoC specific. Is 's32' specific enough to account
> for any differences or future bugs found?
It is probably not. I will change it to "fsl,s32v234-linflexuart" (as
well as in the device tree and driver).
>> +Example:
>> +uart0:serial@...53000 {
>
> space ^
>
>> + compatible = "fsl,s32-linflexuart";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x40053000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> + interrupts = <0 59 4>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>
> Don't show status in examples.
Will fix these too.
Regards,
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists