linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:25:11 +0530
From:   Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable
 'prev_cc'

@YueHaibing thanks for the patch.

On 2019-08-22 08:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-08-19, 20:14, YueHaibing wrote:
>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c: In function 
>> qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut:
>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c:89:38: warning:
>>  variable prev_cc set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> 
>> It is not used since commit 3003e75a5045 ("cpufreq:
>> qcom-hw: Update logic to detect turbo frequency")
>> 
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 +--
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c 
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> index 3eea197..a9ae2f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device 
>> *cpu_dev,
>>  				    struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>>  				    void __iomem *base)
>>  {
>> -	u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0, 
>> freq;
>> +	u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
>>  	u32 volt;
>>  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table	*table;
>> 
>> @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device 
>> *cpu_dev,
>>  			break;
>>  		}
>> 
>> -		prev_cc = core_count;
>>  		prev_freq = freq;
>>  	}
> 
> @Sibi, you fine with this change ? I will merge it with the original 
> patch then.

yes the changes seem fine, I missed
removing prev_cc.

-- 
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.