linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] fuse: pass gfp flags to fuse_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGdZYJK+Q4Ak5hEj3EDeO3QJ=JNPLJZ=G3HZcGQL9zRoMnbtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:52:54 -0700
From:   Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     miklos@...redi.hu, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fuse: pass gfp flags to fuse_request_alloc

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:18 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:10 PM Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Instead of having a helper per flag
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
>
> I think it would be better to re-order the patch 2 and 3 of this
> series. There will be less code churn.

That makes sense to me, I'll follow up with a v2

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4843 bytes)