linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/5] Further sanitize INTEL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F436273@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:50:10 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] Further sanitize INTEL_FAM6 naming

> Looks like your scripts didn't anticipate the CPP gymnastics like:
>
> #define VULNWL_INTEL(model, whitelist)          \
>        VULNWL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, whitelist)

Also INTEL_CPU_FAM6() macro

-Tony