lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 23:56:01 +0200
From:   Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>,
        Sean Nyekjær <sean@...nix.com>,
        Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: avoid recursive locking with async port hangup

When tearing down the n_gsm ldisc while one or more of its child ports
are open, a lock dep warning occurs:

[   56.254258] ======================================================
[   56.260447] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[   56.266641] 5.2.0-00118-g1fd58e20e5b0 #30 Not tainted
[   56.271701] ------------------------------------------------------
[   56.277890] cmux/271 is trying to acquire lock:
[   56.282436] 8215283a (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.}, at: __tty_hangup.part.0+0x58/0x27c
[   56.290128]
[   56.290128] but task is already holding lock:
[   56.295970] e9e2b842 (&gsm->mutex){+.+.}, at: gsm_cleanup_mux+0x9c/0x15c
[   56.302699]
[   56.302699] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[   56.302699]
[   56.310884]
[   56.310884] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   56.318372]
[   56.318372] -> #2 (&gsm->mutex){+.+.}:
[   56.323624]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
[   56.328079]        gsm_cleanup_mux+0x9c/0x15c
[   56.332448]        gsmld_ioctl+0x418/0x4e8
[   56.336554]        tty_ioctl+0x96c/0xcb0
[   56.340492]        do_vfs_ioctl+0x41c/0xa5c
[   56.344685]        ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x60
[   56.348535]        ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
[   56.352815]        0xbe97cc04
[   56.355791]
[   56.355791] -> #1 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}:
[   56.361388]        tty_ldisc_lock+0x50/0x74
[   56.365581]        tty_init_dev+0x88/0x1c4
[   56.369687]        tty_open+0x1c8/0x430
[   56.373536]        chrdev_open+0xa8/0x19c
[   56.377560]        do_dentry_open+0x118/0x3c4
[   56.381928]        path_openat+0x2fc/0x1190
[   56.386123]        do_filp_open+0x68/0xd4
[   56.390146]        do_sys_open+0x164/0x220
[   56.394257]        kernel_init_freeable+0x328/0x3e4
[   56.399146]        kernel_init+0x8/0x110
[   56.403078]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
[   56.407183]        0x0
[   56.409548]
[   56.409548] -> #0 (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.}:
[   56.415402]        __mutex_lock+0x64/0x90c
[   56.419508]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
[   56.423961]        __tty_hangup.part.0+0x58/0x27c
[   56.428676]        gsm_cleanup_mux+0xe8/0x15c
[   56.433043]        gsmld_close+0x48/0x90
[   56.436979]        tty_ldisc_kill+0x2c/0x6c
[   56.441173]        tty_ldisc_release+0x88/0x194
[   56.445715]        tty_release_struct+0x14/0x44
[   56.450254]        tty_release+0x36c/0x43c
[   56.454365]        __fput+0x94/0x1e8

Avoid the warning by doing the port hangup asynchronously.

Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>
---
 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
index d30525946892..36a3eb4ad4c5 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
@@ -1716,7 +1716,7 @@ static void gsm_dlci_release(struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
 		gsm_destroy_network(dlci);
 		mutex_unlock(&dlci->mutex);
 
-		tty_vhangup(tty);
+		tty_hangup(tty);
 
 		tty_port_tty_set(&dlci->port, NULL);
 		tty_kref_put(tty);
-- 
2.22.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ