[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190822.153209.365750764799027706.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com
Cc: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add NETIF_F_HW_BRIDGE feature
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:07:27 +0200
> Current implementation of the SW bridge is setting the interfaces in
> promisc mode when they are added to bridge if learning of the frames is
> enabled.
> In case of Ocelot which has HW capabilities to switch frames, it is not
> needed to set the ports in promisc mode because the HW already capable of
> doing that. Therefore add NETIF_F_HW_BRIDGE feature to indicate that the
> HW has bridge capabilities. Therefore the SW bridge doesn't need to set
> the ports in promisc mode to do the switching.
> This optimization takes places only if all the interfaces that are part
> of the bridge have this flag and have the same network driver.
>
> If the bridge interfaces is added in promisc mode then also the ports part
> of the bridge are set in promisc mode.
This doesn't look right at all.
The Linux bridge provides a software bridge.
By default, all hardware must provide a hardware implementation of
that software bridge behavior.
Anything that deviates from that behavior has to be explicitly asked
for by the user by explicit config commands.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists