linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/rtc: Add option to skip using RTC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:44:03 +0800
From:   Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com
Cc:     linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, rahul.tanwar@...el.com,
        Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/rtc: Add option to skip using RTC

Use a newly introduced optional "status" property of "motorola,mc146818"
compatible DT node to determine if RTC is supported. Skip read/write from
RTC device only when this node is present and status is "disabled". In all
other cases, proceed as before.

Suggested-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
index 586f718b8e95..f9f760a8e76a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmos_lock);
 DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rtc_lock);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtc_lock);
 
+static const struct of_device_id of_cmos_match[] = {
+        { .compatible = "motorola,mc146818" },
+        {}
+};
+
 /*
  * In order to set the CMOS clock precisely, set_rtc_mmss has to be
  * called 500 ms after the second nowtime has started, because when
@@ -42,9 +47,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtc_lock);
 int mach_set_rtc_mmss(const struct timespec64 *now)
 {
 	unsigned long long nowtime = now->tv_sec;
+	struct device_node *node;
 	struct rtc_time tm;
 	int retval = 0;
 
+	node = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_cmos_match);
+	if (node && !of_device_is_available(node))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	rtc_time64_to_tm(nowtime, &tm);
 	if (!rtc_valid_tm(&tm)) {
 		retval = mc146818_set_time(&tm);
@@ -63,8 +73,15 @@ int mach_set_rtc_mmss(const struct timespec64 *now)
 void mach_get_cmos_time(struct timespec64 *now)
 {
 	unsigned int status, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec, century = 0;
+	struct device_node *node;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	node = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_cmos_match);
+	if (node && !of_device_is_available(node)) {
+		now->tv_sec = now->tv_nsec = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If pm_trace abused the RTC as storage, set the timespec to 0,
 	 * which tells the caller that this RTC value is unusable.
-- 
2.11.0