[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwaMDhiCvHX7eL4fL6bcPYd76yYPVL2uuiuKTVW6ZZP4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:45:13 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
"# v3 . 10+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: Fix leak vCPU's VMCS value into other pCPU
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 16:35, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 22/08/19 02:46, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 14:20, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 06/08/19 02:35, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>> Thank you, Paolo! Btw, how about other 5 patches?
> >>
> >> Queued everything else too.
> >
> > How about patch 4/6~5/6, they are not in kvm/queue. :)
>
> I queued 4.
>
> For patch 5, I don't really see the benefit since the hypercall
> arguments are already traced.
Agreed, thank you.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists