[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3877ba50-8c3b-bc88-95d3-3aeb3e09fcf1@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:49:04 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] misc: xilinx_sdfec: Fix a couple small information
leaks
On 22. 08. 19 10:28, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:14:12AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> On 21. 08. 19 9:06, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> These structs have holes in them so we end up disclosing a few bytes of
>>> uninitialized stack data.
>>>
>>> drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c:305 xsdfec_get_status() warn: check that 'status' doesn't leak information (struct has a hole after 'activity')
>>> drivers/misc/xilinx_sdfec.c:449 xsdfec_get_turbo() warn: check that 'turbo_params' doesn't leak information (struct has a hole after 'scale')
>>
>> Who is generating these warnings? Is this any new GCC or different tool?
>> I see that 3byte padding but never seen these warnings.
>
> This is a Smatch check.
ok. It looks like I need to update it to latest version. My version is
not showing these.
Anyway thanks for patches,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists