[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1566474733.p35psfjpl2.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:22:42 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: implement KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> KPROBES_ON_FTRACE avoids much of the overhead with regular kprobes as it
> eliminates the need for a trap, as well as the need to emulate or
> single-step instructions.
>
> Tested on berlin arm64 platform.
>
> ~ # mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/
> ~ # cd /sys/kernel/debug/
> /sys/kernel/debug # echo 'p _do_fork' > tracing/kprobe_events
>
> before the patch:
>
> /sys/kernel/debug # cat kprobes/list
> ffffff801009fe28 k _do_fork+0x0 [DISABLED]
>
> after the patch:
>
> /sys/kernel/debug # cat kprobes/list
> ffffff801009ff54 k _do_fork+0x4 [DISABLED][FTRACE]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists