[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190822122949.GA245353@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:29:49 +0100
From: Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it, bristot@...hat.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, vpillai@...italocean.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/13] sched/deadline: Impose global limits on
sched_attr::sched_period
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 01:53:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Like so?
>
Yes, that's exactly what I meant!
What about this refactoring?
Thanks,
Alessio
---
>From 459d5488acb3fac938b0f35f480a81a6e401ef92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:55:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Impose global limits on
sched_attr::sched_period
There are two DoS scenarios with SCHED_DEADLINE related to
sched_attr::sched_period:
- since access-control only looks at utilization and density, a very
large period can allow a very large runtime, which in turn can
incur a very large latency to lower priority tasks.
- for very short periods we can end up spending more time programming
the hardware timer than actually running the task.
Mitigate these by imposing limits on the period.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
---
include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 7 +++++
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sysctl.c | 14 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
index d4f6215ee03f7..7c8ef07e52133 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
@@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ int sched_proc_update_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_period;
extern int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime;
+extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_max;
+extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_min;
+
+extern int sched_dl_period_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
+ loff_t *ppos);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 0b9cbfb2b1d4f..fcdf70d9c0516 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2640,6 +2640,42 @@ void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr)
attr->sched_flags = dl_se->flags;
}
+/*
+ * Default limits for DL period: on the top end we guard against small util
+ * tasks still getting ridiculous long effective runtimes, on the bottom end we
+ * guard against timer DoS.
+ */
+unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_max = 1 << 22; /* ~4 seconds */
+unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_min = 100; /* 100 us */
+
+int sched_dl_period_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
+ loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ unsigned int old_max, old_min;
+ static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex);
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&mutex);
+ old_max = sysctl_sched_dl_period_max;
+ old_min = sysctl_sched_dl_period_min;
+
+ ret = proc_douintvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ if (!ret && write) {
+ u64 max = (u64)sysctl_sched_dl_period_max * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+ u64 min = (u64)sysctl_sched_dl_period_min * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+
+ if (min < 1ULL << DL_SCALE || max < min) {
+ sysctl_sched_dl_period_max = old_max;
+ sysctl_sched_dl_period_min = old_min;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* This function validates the new parameters of a -deadline task.
* We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal
@@ -2652,6 +2688,8 @@ void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr)
*/
bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
{
+ u64 period, max, min;
+
/* special dl tasks don't actually use any parameter */
if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV)
return true;
@@ -2675,12 +2713,21 @@ bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
return false;
+ period = attr->sched_period;
+ if (!period)
+ period = attr->sched_deadline;
+
/* runtime <= deadline <= period (if period != 0) */
- if ((attr->sched_period != 0 &&
- attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline) ||
+ if (period < attr->sched_deadline ||
attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
return false;
+ max = (u64)READ_ONCE(sysctl_sched_dl_period_max) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+ min = (u64)READ_ONCE(sysctl_sched_dl_period_min) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+
+ if (period < min || period > max)
+ return false;
+
return true;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 078950d9605ba..0d07e4707e9d2 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -442,6 +442,20 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = sched_rt_handler,
},
+ {
+ .procname = "sched_deadline_period_max_us",
+ .data = &sysctl_sched_dl_period_max,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = sched_dl_period_handler,
+ },
+ {
+ .procname = "sched_deadline_period_min_us",
+ .data = &sysctl_sched_dl_period_min,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = sched_dl_period_handler,
+ },
{
.procname = "sched_rr_timeslice_ms",
.data = &sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice,
--
2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists