linux-kernel - [PATCH 08/15] sched,fair: simplify timeslice length code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190822021740.15554-9-riel@surriel.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:17:33 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/15] sched,fair: simplify timeslice length code

The idea behind __sched_period makes sense, but the results do not always.

When a CPU has one high priority task and a large number of low priority
tasks, __sched_period will return a value larger than sysctl_sched_latency,
and the one high priority task may end up getting a timeslice all for itself
that is also much larger than sysctl_sched_latency.

The low priority tasks will have their time slices rounded up to
sysctl_sched_min_granularity, resulting in an even larger scheduling
latency than targeted by __sched_period.

Simplify the code by simply ripping out __sched_period and always taking
fractions of sysctl_sched_latency.

If a high priority task ends up getting a "too small" time slice compared
to low priority tasks, the vruntime scaling ensures that it will simply
get scheduled more frequently than low priority tasks.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 +-----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8f8c85c6da9b..74ee22c59d13 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -691,22 +691,6 @@ static inline u64 calc_delta_fair(u64 delta, struct sched_entity *se)
 	return delta;
 }

-/*
- * The idea is to set a period in which each task runs once.
- *
- * When there are too many tasks (sched_nr_latency) we have to stretch
- * this period because otherwise the slices get too small.
- *
- * p = (nr <= nl) ? l : l*nr/nl
- */
-static u64 __sched_period(unsigned long nr_running)
-{
-	if (unlikely(nr_running > sched_nr_latency))
-		return nr_running * sysctl_sched_min_granularity;
-	else
-		return sysctl_sched_latency;
-}
-
 /*
  * We calculate the wall-time slice from the period by taking a part
  * proportional to the weight.
@@ -715,7 +699,7 @@ static u64 __sched_period(unsigned long nr_running)
  */
 static u64 sched_slice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
 {
-	u64 slice = __sched_period(cfs_rq->nr_running + !se->on_rq);
+	u64 slice = sysctl_sched_latency;

 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		struct load_weight *load;
-- 
2.20.1