linux-kernel - [PATCH v14 3/6] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:28:08 +0100
From:   Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Michal Koutny <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
Subject: [PATCH v14 3/6] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group

The clamp values are not tunable at the level of the root task group.
That's for two main reasons:

 - the root group represents "system resources" which are always
   entirely available from the cgroup standpoint.

 - when tuning/restricting "system resources" makes sense, tuning must
   be done using a system wide API which should also be available when
   control groups are not.

When a system wide restriction is available, cgroups should be aware of
its value in order to know exactly how much "system resources" are
available for the subgroups.

Utilization clamping supports already the concepts of:

 - system defaults: which define the maximum possible clamp values
   usable by tasks.

 - effective clamps: which allows a parent cgroup to constraint (maybe
   temporarily) its descendants without losing the information related
   to the values "requested" from them.

Exploit these two concepts and bind them together in such a way that,
whenever system default are tuned, the new values are propagated to
(possibly) restrict or relax the "effective" value of nested cgroups.

When cgroups are in use, force an update of all the RUNNABLE tasks.
Otherwise, keep things simple and do just a lazy update next time each
task will be enqueued.
Do that since we assume a more strict resource control is required when
cgroups are in use. This allows also to keep "effective" clamp values
updated in case we need to expose them to user-space.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@...e.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 8dab64247597..3ca054ad3f3e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1017,10 +1017,30 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 		uclamp_rq_dec_id(rq, p, clamp_id);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP
+static void cpu_util_update_eff(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css);
+static void uclamp_update_root_tg(void)
+{
+	struct task_group *tg = &root_task_group;
+
+	uclamp_se_set(&tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN],
+		      sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min, false);
+	uclamp_se_set(&tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX],
+		      sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max, false);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	cpu_util_update_eff(&root_task_group.css);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+#else
+static void uclamp_update_root_tg(void) { }
+#endif
+
 int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 				void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
 				loff_t *ppos)
 {
+	bool update_root_tg = false;
 	int old_min, old_max;
 	int result;
 
@@ -1043,16 +1063,23 @@ int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	if (old_min != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min) {
 		uclamp_se_set(&uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MIN],
 			      sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min, false);
+		update_root_tg = true;
 	}
 	if (old_max != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max) {
 		uclamp_se_set(&uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MAX],
 			      sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max, false);
+		update_root_tg = true;
 	}
 
+	if (update_root_tg)
+		uclamp_update_root_tg();
+
 	/*
-	 * Updating all the RUNNABLE task is expensive, keep it simple and do
-	 * just a lazy update at each next enqueue time.
+	 * We update all RUNNABLE tasks only when task groups are in use.
+	 * Otherwise, keep it simple and do just a lazy update at each next
+	 * task enqueue time.
 	 */
+
 	goto done;
 
 undo:
-- 
2.22.0