[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190822133440.GD11845@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:34:40 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEND_UPDATE_DATA command
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 01:27:25PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
> FW accepts the system physical address but the userspace does not know
> the system physical instead it will give host virtual address and we
> will find its corresponding system physical address and make a FW
> call. This is a userspace interface and not the FW.
That fact could be in a sentence or two as a comment above the struct
definition.
> Okay, I will take a look and will probably reuse your functions. thank you.
Sure, and pls see if you can simplify the other command-sending
functions in a similar manner.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists