lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190822170811.13303-8-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:06:03 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Henry Burns <henryburns@...gle.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Adams <jwadams@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Vul <vitaly.vul@...y.com>,
        Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Henry Burns <henrywolfeburns@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 007/135] mm/z3fold.c: fix z3fold_destroy_pool() ordering

From: Henry Burns <henryburns@...gle.com>

commit 6051d3bd3b91e96c59e62b8be2dba1cc2b19ee40 upstream.

The constraint from the zpool use of z3fold_destroy_pool() is there are
no outstanding handles to memory (so no active allocations), but it is
possible for there to be outstanding work on either of the two wqs in
the pool.

If there is work queued on pool->compact_workqueue when it is called,
z3fold_destroy_pool() will do:

   z3fold_destroy_pool()
     destroy_workqueue(pool->release_wq)
     destroy_workqueue(pool->compact_wq)
       drain_workqueue(pool->compact_wq)
         do_compact_page(zhdr)
           kref_put(&zhdr->refcount)
             __release_z3fold_page(zhdr, ...)
               queue_work_on(pool->release_wq, &pool->work) *BOOM*

So compact_wq needs to be destroyed before release_wq.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726224810.79660-1-henryburns@google.com
Fixes: 5d03a6613957 ("mm/z3fold.c: use kref to prevent page free/compact race")
Signed-off-by: Henry Burns <henryburns@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Adams <jwadams@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Vul <vitaly.vul@...y.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: Henry Burns <henrywolfeburns@...il.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 mm/z3fold.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/z3fold.c b/mm/z3fold.c
index 3b27094dc42e1..d06d7f9560028 100644
--- a/mm/z3fold.c
+++ b/mm/z3fold.c
@@ -820,8 +820,15 @@ static void z3fold_destroy_pool(struct z3fold_pool *pool)
 {
 	kmem_cache_destroy(pool->c_handle);
 	z3fold_unregister_migration(pool);
-	destroy_workqueue(pool->release_wq);
+
+	/*
+	 * We need to destroy pool->compact_wq before pool->release_wq,
+	 * as any pending work on pool->compact_wq will call
+	 * queue_work(pool->release_wq, &pool->work).
+	 */
+
 	destroy_workqueue(pool->compact_wq);
+	destroy_workqueue(pool->release_wq);
 	kfree(pool);
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ