lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190823052844.GA70417@archlinux-threadripper>
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 22:28:44 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Miles Chen (陳民樺) 
        <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, Tri Vo <trong@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER implementation for Clang

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 01:02:05PM -0700, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:30 AM Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > The stackframe setup when compiled with clang is different.
> > Since the stack unwinder expects the gcc stackframe setup it
> > fails to print backtraces. This patch adds support for the
> > clang stackframe setup.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/35
> > Cc: clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
> > Suggested-by: Tri Vo <trong@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>
> > Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> 
> Great, thanks for following up on the suggestions from code review.
> Since this is going to go up via the arm tree, which has its own
> process, please add my:
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> to the commit message, then submit the patch to the maintainer's patch
> tracking system:
> https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
> (create a login, sign in, then visit:
> https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/add.php . I think the
> correct thing is to put the first line of the commit in the summary
> field, next/master as the kernel version (I applied/tested off of
> -next), then the rest of the commit message body in the Patch Notes
> field.  Make sure to attach the patch file.  Finally, it should appear
> at https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/section.php?section=0
> I think within 24hrs).

Also for the record, I came across this a couple of months ago, Catalin
Marinas had a git config alias that could be used for sending one patch
to the patches email address so that you don't have to muck around the
web interface:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190624144924.GE29120@arrakis.emea.arm.com/

Web interface works fine but I prefer everything via the command line :)

Cheers,
Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ