linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl support for MT6779 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbZY2vZBaEXDMsjLxA1NGYWirhCdspu0W-foXJX=Fd4yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:59:08 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        CC Hwang <cc.hwang@...iatek.com>,
        Loda Chou <loda.chou@...iatek.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com,
        mtk01761 <wendell.lin@...iatek.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Teng <andy.teng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl support for
 MT6779 SoC

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:12 PM Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:22 AM Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > This adds MT6779 pinctrl driver based on MediaTek pinctrl-paris core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Teng <andy.teng@...iatek.com>
>
> Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>

Please look at the DT bindings as well when you have time, and
especially the "virtual GPIO" patch, I don't understand that at all.

I suspect the "virtual GPIO" is maybe more about something that
should be done by setting up the valid_mask in the gpio_chip
or something.

Yours,
Linus Walleij