lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:36:37 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        kernel-team@...com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Do not split_large_page() for
 set_kernel_text_rw()

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:23:35PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> As 4k pages check was removed from cpa [1], set_kernel_text_rw() leads to
> split_large_page() for all kernel text pages. This means a single kprobe
> will put all kernel text in 4k pages:
> 
>   root@ ~# grep ffff81000000- /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/kernel
>   0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff82400000     20M  ro    PSE      x  pmd
> 
>   root@ ~# echo ONE_KPROBE >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
>   root@ ~# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable
> 
>   root@ ~# grep ffff81000000- /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/kernel
>   0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff82400000     20M  ro             x  pte
> 
> To fix this issue, introduce CPA_FLIP_TEXT_RW to bypass "Text RO" check
> in static_protections().
> 
> Two helper functions set_text_rw() and set_text_ro() are added to flip
> _PAGE_RW bit for kernel text.
> 
> [1] commit 585948f4f695 ("x86/mm/cpa: Avoid the 4k pages check completely")

ARGH; so this is because ftrace flips the whole kernel range to RW and
back for giggles? I'm thinking _that_ is a bug, it's a clear W^X
violation.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ