lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:57:07 +0800
From:   Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] mfd: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC

Hi,

On Mon, 2019-08-12 at 11:59 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> 
> > This adds support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC. This is a
> > multifunction device with the following sub modules:
> > 
> > - Regulator
> > - RTC
> > - Codec
> > - Interrupt
> > 
> > It is interfaced to the host controller using SPI interface
> > by a proprietary hardware called PMIC wrapper or pwrap.
> > MT6358 MFD is a child device of the pwrap.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/Makefile                 |   3 +-
> >  drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c             | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c            |  52 ++++++-
> >  include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h      | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/mfd/mt6358/registers.h | 282 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h      |   3 +
> >  6 files changed, 725 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/mt6358/registers.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > index 9a96325..36d088b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > @@ -241,7 +241,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC)	+= intel-soc-pmic.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_BXTWC)	+= intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTWC)	+= intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTDC_TI)	+= intel_soc_pmic_chtdc_ti.o
> > -mt6397-objs	:= mt6397-core.o mt6397-irq.o
> > +
> > +mt6397-objs			:= mt6397-core.o mt6397-irq.o mt6358-irq.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MT6397)	+= mt6397.o
> >  
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ALTERA_A10SR)	+= altera-a10sr.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..2f55079
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +//
> > +// Copyright (c) 2019 MediaTek Inc.
> > +
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/mt6358/registers.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static void pmic_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i, top_gp, en_reg, int_regs, shift;
> > +	struct mt6397_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > +	struct pmic_irq_data *irqd = chip->irq_data;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < irqd->num_pmic_irqs; i++) {
> > +		if (irqd->enable_hwirq[i] == irqd->cache_hwirq[i])
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		top_gp = 0;
> > +		while ((top_gp + 1) < ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_ints) &&
> > +		       i >= mt6358_ints[top_gp + 1].hwirq_base)
> > +			top_gp++;
> 
> A comment here would make this easier to follow.
> 
I will add it in next version.
> > +		if (top_gp >= ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_ints)) {
> > +			mutex_unlock(&chip->irqlock);
> > +			dev_err(chip->dev,
> > +				"Failed to get top_group: %d\n", top_gp);
> > +			return;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		int_regs = (i - mt6358_ints[top_gp].hwirq_base) /
> > +			    MT6358_REG_WIDTH;
> > +		en_reg = mt6358_ints[top_gp].en_reg +
> > +			mt6358_ints[top_gp].en_reg_shift * int_regs;
> > +		shift = (i - mt6358_ints[top_gp].hwirq_base) % MT6358_REG_WIDTH;
> > +		regmap_update_bits(chip->regmap, en_reg, BIT(shift),
> > +				   irqd->enable_hwirq[i] << shift);
> > +		irqd->cache_hwirq[i] = irqd->enable_hwirq[i];
> > +	}
> > +	mutex_unlock(&chip->irqlock);
> > +}
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +int mt6358_irq_init(struct mt6397_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > +	int i, j, ret;
> > +	struct pmic_irq_data *irqd;
> > +
> > +	irqd = devm_kzalloc(chip->dev, sizeof(struct pmic_irq_data *),
> > +			    GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!irqd)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	chip->irq_data = irqd;
> > +
> > +	mutex_init(&chip->irqlock);
> > +	irqd->top_int_status_reg = MT6358_TOP_INT_STATUS0;
> > +	irqd->num_pmic_irqs = MT6358_IRQ_NR;
> > +	irqd->num_top = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_ints);
> > +
> > +	irqd->enable_hwirq = devm_kcalloc(chip->dev,
> > +					  irqd->num_pmic_irqs,
> > +					  sizeof(bool),
> > +					  GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!irqd->enable_hwirq)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	irqd->cache_hwirq = devm_kcalloc(chip->dev,
> > +					 irqd->num_pmic_irqs,
> > +					 sizeof(bool),
> > +					 GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!irqd->cache_hwirq)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	/* Disable all interrupt for initializing */
> 
> s/interrupt/interrupts/
> 
I will fix it in the next version.
> > +	for (i = 0; i < irqd->num_top; i++) {
> > +		for (j = 0; j < mt6358_ints[i].num_int_regs; j++)
> > +			regmap_write(chip->regmap,
> > +				     mt6358_ints[i].en_reg +
> > +				     mt6358_ints[i].en_reg_shift * j, 0);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	chip->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(chip->dev->of_node,
> > +						 irqd->num_pmic_irqs,
> > +						 &mt6358_irq_domain_ops, chip);
> > +	if (!chip->irq_domain) {
> > +		dev_err(chip->dev, "could not create irq domain\n");
> 
> s/irq/IRQ/
> 
I will fix it in the next version.
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(chip->dev, chip->irq, NULL,
> > +					mt6358_irq_handler, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > +					mt6358_irq_chip.name, chip);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to register irq=%d; err: %d\n",
> > +			chip->irq, ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	enable_irq_wake(chip->irq);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> [...]
> 
> >  static const struct chip_data mt6397_core = {
> >  	.cid_addr = MT6397_CID,
> >  	.cid_shift = 0,
> > @@ -135,7 +172,11 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (pmic->irq <= 0)
> >  		return pmic->irq;
> >  
> > -	ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
> > +	if (pmic->chip_id == MT6358_CHIP_ID)
> > +		ret = mt6358_irq_init(pmic);
> > +	else
> > +		ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
> > +
> 
> You may with so to check for both and error out on an unsupported chip
> ID.
> 
Thanks for the comments.
For now, we have two kinds of irq desigen, new (mt6358) and others
(including mt6391/mt6397/mt6323).
For the unsupported chip, we have a check in the mt6397_irq_init.

> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > @@ -146,6 +187,12 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  					   0, pmic->irq_domain);
> >  		break;
> >  
> > +	case MT6358_CHIP_ID:
> > +		ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6358_devs,
> 
> Not -1.  Please use the defines.
> 
> > +					   ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_devs), NULL,
> > +					   0, pmic->irq_domain);
> > +		break;
> > +
> >  	case MT6391_CHIP_ID:
> >  	case MT6397_CHIP_ID:
> >  		ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6397_devs,
> > @@ -171,6 +218,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id mt6397_of_match[] = {
> >  		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6323",
> >  		.data = &mt6323_core,
> >  	}, {
> > +		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6358",
> > +		.data = &mt6358_core,
> > +	}, {
> >  		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6397",
> >  		.data = &mt6397_core,
> >  	}, {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..05108617
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2019 MediaTek Inc.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __MFD_MT6358_CORE_H__
> > +#define __MFD_MT6358_CORE_H__
> > +
> > +#define MT6358_REG_WIDTH 16
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +#define MT6358_TOP_GEN(sp)	\
> > +{	\
> > +	.hwirq_base = MT6358_IRQ_##sp##_BASE,	\
> > +	.num_int_regs =	\
> > +		((MT6358_IRQ_##sp##_BITS - 1) / MT6358_REG_WIDTH) + 1,	\
> > +	.num_int_bits = MT6358_IRQ_##sp##_BITS, \
> > +	.en_reg = MT6358_##sp##_TOP_INT_CON0,		\
> > +	.en_reg_shift = 0x6,	\
> > +	.sta_reg = MT6358_##sp##_TOP_INT_STATUS0,		\
> > +	.sta_reg_shift = 0x2,	\
> > +	.top_offset = MT6358_##sp##_TOP,	\
> > +}
> 
> Please tab out the '\'s.
> 
I will fix it in the next version.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ