[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fda67a5d-6984-c3ef-8125-7805d927f15b@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:10:46 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Graf (AWS), Alexander" <graf@...zon.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Radim K <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/20] KVM RISC-V Support
On 23/08/19 13:44, Graf (AWS), Alexander wrote:
>> Overall, I'm quite happy with the code. It's a very clean implementation
>> of a KVM target.
Yup, I said the same even for v1 (I prefer recursive implementation of
page table walking but that's all I can say).
>> I will send v6 next week. I will try my best to implement unpriv
>> trap handling in v6 itself.
> Are you sure unpriv is the only exception that can hit there? What
> about NMIs? Do you have #MCs yet (ECC errors)? Do you have something
> like ARM's #SError which can asynchronously hit at any time because
> of external bus (PCI) errors?
As far as I know, all interrupts on RISC-V are disabled by
local_irq_disable()/local_irq_enable().
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists